Comparison of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Conventional Ventilation In Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Aim: The use of positive airway pressure in babies with respiratory failure has been associated significant reductions failure, morbidity, and death. two most popular CPAP techniques are bladder (B-CPAP) ventilator-assisted (V-CPAP). We wanted to see if B-CPAP V-CPAP have different survival rates problems. Methods: This retrospective medical trial included 60 preterm between 1500- 2500 g who were hospitalized Mayo Hospital's neonatal critical care unit for breathing difficulties May 2019 April 2020. Between 2020, they distress. patients allocated therapy groups at random. To calculate evaluate rates, a analysis was done. compare survival. t-test sample data used assess the length supplemental oxygen, hospital stay, cost stay. Results: At 24 hours, predicted subgroups 100% 78%, correspondingly. comparable results after 48 hours 72%. Furthermore, group's hospitalization expenditures considerably greater than groups. Conclusion: Based on our findings, helpful treating newborns reduced hospitalization. In addition usual benefits, lower may be factor its widespread when contrasted V-CPAP. Keywords: Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Versus Conventional Ventilation, Neonates With Respiratory.